バルバドス商務知的財産庁 動画
1. CAIPO Is Going Digital、5:00
1. CAIPO Is Going Digital、5:00
After many years of deliberation, applications for Geographical Indications (GIs) are now being accepted by the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL). This follows regulations that were issued in October 2022 which established Philippines’ first GI registration system.
情報源: Registration Of Geographical Indications Now Possible In Philippines – Trademark – Philippines
The State Intellectual Property Office (CNIPA) promoted the revision of the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China and on January 13, 2023, issued the Amendment to the Trademark Law (Draft for Comments), which is now open for comments.Specific opinions on the revision and improvement of the Draft for Comments must be submitted before February 27, 2023.
情報源: [NEWS] CNIPA Issues The Revised Draft Of The Trademark Law – Trademark – China
国家知识产权局 通知 国家知识产权局关于《中华人民共和国商标法修订草案(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见的通知
A Manhattan federal jury on Wednesday concluded that an artist’s non-fungible token versions of Hermes’ famous Birkin bags violated the French fashion house’s trademark rights.In one of the first intellectual-property trials over the popular digital tokens known as NFTs, the jury found artist Mason Rothschild’s unauthorized “MetaBirkins” were likely to confuse consumers.
情報源: Hermes wins US trademark trial over ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs – CNN Style
「エルメス(HERMES)」の“バーキン(Birkin)”を模したNFTアート“メタバーキン(MetaBirkins)”の商標権侵害などを巡る裁判で、9人の陪審員は「エルメス」の主張を認め、 “メタバーキン”を製作・販売したメイソン・ロスチャイルド(Mason Rothschild)に対して、計13万3000ドル(約1755万円)の損害賠償を命じた。
情報源: “メタバーキン”訴訟、陪審員は「エルメス」を支持 NFTアート製作者は「壊れた司法制度」と徹底抗戦の構え – WWDJAPAN
続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Hermes wins US trademark trial over ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs | CNN Style”
The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief on February 3 with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the Court to clarify issues related to the application of the Lanham Act to trademark disputes that cross international borders.
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.
U.S. Supreme Court
Amicus Brief filed by American Bar Association (ABA)
米国連邦商標法、不正競争、登録商標及び未登録商標の保護(§32, §43)
(2023.2.16 追記)
The Vanity Fair test, derived from Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. T. Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1956), considers three factors: (1) whether the defendant is a United States citizen; (2) whether there was a conflict with trademark rights established under the relevant law of the foreign jurisdiction; and (3) whether the defendant’s conduct has a “substantial effect on United States commerce.” Vanity Fair, 234 F.2d at 642. (Extraterritorial TM Disputes)
外国人はVanity Fair testの最初のテスト、United States citizenに該当しないため、Vanity Fair testを採用する裁判管轄であっても問題は生じないことになりそうです。
In T‑726/21, the General Court confirmed that Rolex cannot oppose the registration for ‘clothing’ of a mark representing a crown.
The CG found that there is no likelihood of confusion as ‘watches’ and ‘clothing’ are dissimilar goods.
— European Union Intellectual Property Office (@EU_IPO) February 7, 2023
Trademark signs
FAQ’s BIP
Infomercial videos
続きを読む“シント・マールテン知的財産局 (BIP SXM) 商標_動画 vol.1 (embedded/playlists)”