김치, 국가(전국) 단위 지리적표시 시행 「농수산물 품질관리법」시행령 주요 개정 내용은 다음과 같다. ① 김치 지리적표시 대상지역에 국가(전국) 영역을 추가(제12조) – 김치의 경우 행정구역, 특정지역 외에 국가(전국) 영역을 대상지역으로 지리적표시를 등록할 수 있는 법적 근거를 마련하였다. * 김치: (현행) 행정구역, 산·강 등 → (개정) 국가(전국) 영역, 행정구역, 산·강 등 – 이에 따라 자유무역협정(FTA)을 통해 상대국에 지리적표시 보호 목록 등을 확대해 나가면 해외에서 외국산 김치가 ‘한국김치’ 등으로 표기되는 사례가 방지될 것으로 기대된다.
FROM KIPRIS
Registration No. : 4015182120000
Application Date : 2019. 01. 30 Application Number : 40-2019-0016379
Appl. Publ (Date) : 2019. 06. 19 Publication Number : 40-2019-0066947
Date of Decision to Grant Registration (Trial Decision) : 2019. 09. 02 Number of Classification of Goods : 1
Designated Goods or Designated Service Business
Class No.31 : 묘목, 나무, 살아있는 나무, 신선한 과실
(Expected)Date of Expiration : 2029. 09. 05
(Right Holder) 유동우（YOO, Dong-Woo） 전라남도 장성군… (ユドンオ 全羅南道長城郡…)
[Request for Trial] Request for Trial ([심판청구]심판청구서) 2021.05.07
Date of Request for Trial : 2021. 05. 07 Trial Number : 2021 당 1354
Indication of Case : 상표등록 제1518212호 무효
Purport of Claim : “상표등록 제40-1518212호는 그 등록을 무효로 한다. ” 라는 심결을 구합니다.
Plaintiff : 국제원예종묘농업회사법인주식회사 (国際園芸種苗農業会社法人株式会社)
高級ブドウ「ルビーロマン」１房１５０万円, 1:42
高級ブドウ「ルビーロマン」１房１５０万円
Why Japanese Ruby Roman Grapes Are So Expensive | So Expensive, 8:01
Why Japanese Ruby Roman Grapes Are So Expensive | So Expensive
The Korean Intellectual Property Office recently updated the Trademark Examination Guidelines, the Similar Goods Examination Guidelines and the Trademark Act Enforcement Rules. The updates affect, among other things, Class 09 software descriptions and non-traditional and foreign language trademarks. This article summarises the most noteworthy changes.
It is often time that matters in business. For trademarks, a prompt registration is probably the single most important issue in all areas of business, not just in the fashion industry. In Korea, it takes approximately one to 1.2 years to obtain a registered trademark using the regular system. However, this period can be shortened substantially if one uses fast-track examination.
Agency established to contribute to the development of the national economy by performing work such as trade promotion, investment between domestic and foreign companies and support of industrial technology cooperation etc.
Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) 韓国商標制度
The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) has argued that recent trademark disputes involving Pengsu, Bogyeom TV, etc. are not due to legitimate applications by trademark users, but to unfair trade mark preemption that seeks to obtain economic benefits by piggybacking on the trust of others. It decided that the application was for the purpose, and announced that it would further strengthen its trademark examination.
![[kotra] IP-DESK 해외지식재산센터 홍보영상](https://www.tm106.jp/wp-content/plugins/wp-youtube-lyte/lyteCache.php?origThumbUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FQYRirkTrVVE%2F0.jpg)
