Philippine Supreme Court found dissimilarity in alligator logo dispute
The Supreme Court rules that there are ‘distinct visual differences’ in both their logos, and that Crocodile has no intent to ‘ride on the goodwill of Lacoste’ After 20 years of legal disputes that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, Lacoste has lost its trademark case against Crocodile over the use of what it claimed to be a “confusingly similar” logo.
情報源: Lacoste loses trademark fight vs Crocodile in the Philippines
The new Lacoste Campaign I Go for a Lacoste Polo、0:20 
The new Lacoste Campaign I Go for a Lacoste Polo
Lacoste S.A. Vs. Crocodile International Pte Ltd. 
Supreme Court of Philippine
83 / 100
こちらの記事もどうぞ
商標登録insideNews: Australia Post loses trademark fight to startup Sendle | Chinchilla News 
商標登録insideNews: Intent Not Required for Trademark Profit Award, High Court Says 商標登録insideNews: US Supreme Court rules trademark rights may survive bankruptcy rejection – JURIST 
商標登録insideNews: Ralph Lauren loses trademark fight with British polo club | TODAYonline 商標登録insideNews: Trademark infringement and procedural rules 米国最高裁動向(2022.2) | SCOTUSblog 
商標登録insideNews: Chinese court rules in favour of BBC in trademark lawsuit | The Star Online 商標登録insideNews: US Supreme Court takes up ‘Dewberry’ trademark dispute | Reuters 
商標登録insideNews: Nespresso ends trademark fight with Peet’s over coffee pods | Reuters 商標登録insideNews: Booking.com wins key trademark case at the Supreme Court – CNNPolitics 
商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court refuses to hear case questioning Google’s trademark | Ars Technica 商標登録insideNews: Justices keep it clean in debate over FUCT trademark – CNNPolitics 商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court to hear Jack Daniel’s trademark case against dog toy company | cnbc.com